The necessary debate on the use of Artificial Intelligence

We have witnessed how Artificial Intelligence (hereinafter, AI) has gradually permeated different sectors of our society and has done so silently, encouraged by man’s “let-doing. Which has largely led us to not be aware of the extent to which it is already part of our daily lives; an aspect that has increased in the current context of a global pandemic, against which AI systems have proven immune to the effects, in many ways devastating, of COVID- Everyone knows that Law in its many facets has also received the imprint of AI and, in what we want to highlight here, it has landed in the world of justice.

These AI projects allow us to verify

Which allow, as far as we are concerned here, to have systems with the technical capacity to develop resolution Artificial Intelligence models and develop arguments on a topic with a quality that is not inconsiderable. This interference, which seems Malaysia WhatsApp Number List unstoppable in a st century justice system, nevertheless worries national, supranational and international institutions. And it is worrying, not because it is understood that AI should be totally excluded from this area of ​​our society but because, based on the benefits that its use may bring.

WhatsApp Mobile Number List

Progress has occurred especially

The challenge for the future, or perhaps it is more accurate to talk about the present, is to analyze the possibilities for implementing AI systems with an analytical and predictive purpose; that is, as a tool for preparing judicial resolutions. The existing Iceland WhatsApp Number List experiences seem to find their most favorable habitat in some sectors of civil law (small claims such as the robot judges in Estonia or the online Courts in British Colombia or in Spain the BIDARACIV project for analysis of legal argumentation in the field of custody in the civil law of Aragon) and criminal (risk of recidivism with the COMPAS program in some US States), but this should not lead us to exclude the scope of the contentious-administrative process.