Last week I gave a guest lecture at Nyenrode about The App Effect . During my talk I talked about the recent trend report: “ We The Web ”. In this trend report Jaap Bloem and I describe how the web is moving from a Social Graph to an Interest Graph . In the near future the web will know what I find interesting and this information will know how to find me.
Social networks – limitation or enrichment of creativity?
A students whether this development was not a bad one. After all, what does this development mean for your creativity if everything canada phone number list is served to you on a tailor-made basis? Isn’t it precisely that which is outside your field of vision that is so interesting? In my answer, I said that my social network acts as a filter on the enormous amount of information that is present on the web. And that for me this guarantees serendipity and therefore creativity.
The question did not leave me alone. And today I stumbled upon the keynote “ Beware Online Filter Bubbles ” by Eli Pariser. A keynote that Pariser recently gave for Ted. (Strangely enough, the video was removed from Ted. Why ?) In the video he says: “It’s your own personal, unique universe of information that you live in online. What’s in lob directory it depends on who you are and what you do. But the thing is, you don’t decide what gets in, and you don’t see what gets edited out.” (also read the article on Wired ).
In his eyes, social networks such as Facebook
Twitter and search engines such as Google are actually detrimental to serendipity. At the end of his story, he calls on drafting patent applications for ai innovations the people behind these networks to provide insight into the algorithms they create to push information to us. Insight leads to transparency and this Afterwards I was , according to Pariser, should lead to serendipity.